JWD Your personal alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 43(4), 2007, pp. 789-793
© Wildlife Disease Association  2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lebarbenchon, C.
Right arrow Articles by Gauthier-Clerc, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lebarbenchon, C.
Right arrow Articles by Gauthier-Clerc, M.

SHORT COMMUNICATION

Influenza A Virus in Birds during Spring Migration in the Camargue, France

Camille Lebarbenchon1,2,4, Chung-Ming Chang2,3, Sylvie van der Werf3, Jean-Thierry Aubin3, Yves Kayser1, Manuel Ballesteros1, François Renaud2, Frédéric Thomas2 and Michel Gauthier-Clerc1

1 Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat, Le Sambuc, 13200 Arles, France;
2 GEMI, UMR CNRS/IRD 2724, IRD, 911 Avenue, Agropolis BP 64501, 34394 Montpellier Cedex 5, France;
3 Unité de Génétique Moléculaire des Virus Respiratoires, URA1966 CNRS, EA302 Université Paris 7, Institut Pasteur, 25-28 Rue du Dr Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France

4 Corresponding author (email: lebarbenchon{at}tourduvalat.org)

ABSTRACT:   Wild aquatic birds are considered to be the natural reservoir for influenza A viruses, and previous studies have focused mainly on species in the orders Anseriformes and Charadriiformes. In this study, we surveyed a larger spectrum of potential hosts belonging to 10 avian orders. Cloacal swabs (n=1,044) from 72 free-living bird species, were analysed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for the presence of avian influenza virus. Only two Mediterranean Gulls (Larus melanocephalus) tested positive; one of these viruses was identified as an H9N2 subtype. The absence of infection among passerine birds supports the idea that the prevalence of avian influenza virus infection in terrestrial species is low.
  Key words:  Avian influenza, H9N2, Larus melanocephalus, Mediterranean Gulls, passerine birds.

Wild aquatic birds in the orders Anseriformes (ducks, geese, and swans) and Charadriiformes (gulls, terns, and waders) are traditionally considered as natural hosts for most avian influenza viruses (AIV; Webster et al., 1992). Although AIV have been isolated from other wild bird species (Olsen et al., 2006), less attention has been devoted to species in other avian orders. Consequently, the role of many avian species as potential hosts for AIV is unknown.

The Camargue area is an alluvial wetland covering some 140,000 ha in the Rhône delta in the south of France, and it is at the crossroads of numerous migratory routes of Palaearctic birds (Blondel and Isenmann, 1981; Berthold, 2001). Therefore, the Camargue is considered as a high-risk area for the introduction and transmission of diseases transmitted by wild avian species, such as West Nile virus (Jourdain et al., 2007b) and AIV. The risk of virus introduction by birds from sub-Saharan Africa into Western Europe is highest during spring migration between March and June (Jourdain et al., 2007a). The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of AIV infection in a large diversity of avian hosts during spring migration.

From mid-March to late June 2006, different bird species were trapped using mist nets. Nets were placed in bushes located a few hundred meters behind the Piémanson beach, southeast of Salins de Giraud (Arles, France), in an attempt to capture migratory birds immediately after their crossing of the Mediterranean Sea. Cloacal swabs were used to collect fecal samples, except for passerines; due to their small size, we collected samples of fresh droppings to avoid injury. For Ciconiiformes (herons and egrets) and Phoenicopteriformes (greater flamingo [Phoenicopterus ruber]), cloacal swabs were collected from chicks in breeding colonies. For gulls, fresh dropping samples were collected near nests.

Cloacal swabs were collected using the Viral Pack kit (Biomedics, S.L., Madrid, Spain) and kept at 4 C until they were transported back to the laboratory and kept at –80 C until RNA extraction was performed. Automatic RNA extraction was performed using the BioRobot MDx workstation and QIAamp Virus BioRobot MDX kit (QIAGEN GmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The presence of AIV was first detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) targeting the conserved matrix gene segment. Superscript II kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) was used for RT-PCR in a final volume of 25 µl containing 5 µl total RNA in the presence of 0.4 µM final concentration of each primer: M52C, 5'-CTT CTA ACC GAG GTC GAA ACG-3' and M253R, 5'-AGG GCA TTT TGG ACA AAK CGT CTA-3' (Fouchier et al., 2000). Cycling conditions included a reverse transcription step for 30 min at 45 C, 15 min at 55 C, and 2 min at 94 C; PCR reaction was performed during five cycles, including 15 sec at 94 C, 30 sec at 45 C, and 30 sec at 72 C and during 35 cycles for 15 sec at 94 C, 30 sec at 55 C, and 30 sec (plus 2 sec per cycle) at 72 C. The RT-PCR amplification products were analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis with ethidium bromide staining.

To confirm RT-PCR results, positive and weakly positive samples were tested again by real-time quantitative RT–PCR (RT-qPCR) using the same primers as for RT-PCR with a specific hydrolysis probe, 5'-(Fam)GCT AAA GAC AAG ACC AAT CCT GTC ACC TCT G(Tamra)-3' (Sigma-Proligo, Saint-Quentin, Fallavier, France), for the AIV matrix gene. Light-Cycler RT-qPCR was carried out using the LightCycler RNA amplification kit for probe hybridization (Roche Biochemicals, Basel, Switzerland). Amplification and detection were performed on a LightCycler 1.5 (Roche Biochemicals) after one cycle of reverse transcription (55 C, 15 min; 95 C, 2 min) and 45 cycles of amplification (95 C, 10 sec; 58 C, 30 sec). The RT-qPCR results were analyzed by LightCycler 3.0 software (Roche Biochemicals). Positive samples were subtyped at the Institut Pasteur (Paris, France), using a SYBR Green-based RT-qPCR technique. For the H5, an RT-qPCR was performed on a LightCycler 1.5 using primers H5/+/1544, 5'-CCG CAG TAT TCA GAA GAA GC-3' and H5/–/1683, 5'-AGA CCA GCT ACC ATG ATT GC-3' and the specific probe H5/probe/1638–1662, 5'-(Fam) AGT GCT AGG GAA CTC GCC ACT GTA G (Tamra)-3' following reaction conditions mentioned above.

Fecal samples were collected and tested from 1,044 free-living birds representing 72 species, 30 families, and 10 orders (Table 1Go). Passerine birds (n=621) represent 59.5% of our total sampling. Of the 25 samples found positive by the initial RT-PCR, only two fecal samples from Mediterranean Gulls (Larus melanocephalus) were confirmed positive by RT-qPCR. Prevalence for this species reached 3% (n=67); 2% when all Charadriiformes’ samples (n=102) or gull samples (n=96) were considered.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Bird orders, families, species, number of samples analyzed, and number of infected birds.

 
The prevalence of AIV detected in gulls is comparable with recent data found in the literature for Eurasian species (Fouchier et al., 2003) and to prevalence estimates from numerous studies reporting AIV isolations from gulls and terns from 1974 to 1984 from Eurasia, North, America, and Australia (Stallknecht and Shane, 1988). Based on a summary from all published reports of AIV isolations from gulls worldwide, a prevalence of 1.4% was reported (Olsen et al., 2006). In gulls, AIVs are divided into American and Eurasian lineages, and some specific subtypes, such as the H13 and H16, are thought to be associated with a gull reservoir (Fouchier et al., 2005; Olsen et al., 2006).

Molecular subtyping of hemagglutinin and neuraminidase revealed that the virus from one of the two positive gull samples is H9N2, whereas the H5N1 and H5N2 subtypes were formally excluded for the other sample. The H9 AIV has been isolated in wild ducks throughout the world. However, for gulls, the only available report of H9 viruses is from the Americas (Obenauer et al., 2006), but these were not of the N2 subtype. Influenza A H9N2 viruses have been detected worldwide in poultry, and they currently are endemic in poultry in Asia (Li et al., 2005; Xu et al., 2007). Cases of H9N2 influenza virus infection in humans in this area have also been reported since 1999 (Peiris et al., 1999). Our results support a circulation of H9N2 AIV in Mediterranean Charadriiformes, although more investigations are required to better understand the AIV infection level for Palaearctic species.

Gulls breed in colonies located on small islands in salt marsh areas. Although it is possible that these habitats may be less favorable for environmental transmission via water than freshwater habitats (Stallknecht et al., 1990), this may be offset by a high contact rate. Like gulls, Ciconiiformes, and Phoenicopteriformes breed in colonies, with adults and juveniles crowded in small areas, this creates good opportunities for viral transmission. The absence of positive detection of AIV is of particular value, because very few data are available for these orders.

Prevalence of AIV infections in passerine birds is known to be particularly low (Fouchier et al., 2003; Morishita et al., 1999; Schnebel et al., 2005). Although our results support these observations, further data should be collected on a larger number of species and individuals, and at other periods of the year to more fully understand the ecology of AIV in Passeriformes.

We are grateful to Antoine Arnaud, Leire Paz, Philippe Perret, Christophe Pin, and Nicolas Vincent-Martin for help on birds sampling. We acknowledge the technical help of Frédérique Cuvelier, Patricia Jeannin, Vanessa Roca, and Philippe Thebault for analysis of the samples. Camille Lebarbenchon is supported by a "Tour du Valat/Région Languedoc-Roussillon" PhD grant. This work was funded by the French "Agence Nationale de la Recherche" (ANR) "Santé-Environnement."

LITERATURE CITED

BERTHOLD, P. 2001. Bird migration: A general survey. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 253 pp.

BLONDEL, J., AND P. ISENMANN. 1981. Guide des oiseaux de Camargue. Delachaux & Niestlé, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

FOUCHIER, R. A. M., T. M. BESTEBOER, S. HERFST, L. VAN DER KEMP, G. S. RIMMELZWANN, AND A. D. M. E. OSTERHAUS. 2000. Detection of influenza A viruses from different species by PCR amplification of conserved sequences in the matrix gene. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 38: 4096–4101.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

———, B. OLSEN, T. M. BESTEBROER, S. HERFST, L. VAN DER KEMP, G. F. RIMMELZWAAN, AND A. D. M. E. OSTERHAUS. 2003. Influenza A virus surveillance in wild birds in Northern Europe in 1999 and 2000. Avian Diseases 47: 857–860.[Medline]

———, V. MUNSTER, A. WALLENSTEN, T. M. BESTEB- ROER, S. HERFST, D. SMITH, G. F. RIMMELZWAAN, B. OLSEN, AND A. D. M. E. OSTERHAUS. 2005. Characterization of a novel influenza A virus hemagglutinin subtype (H16) obtained from black-headed gulls. Journal of Virology 79: 2814–2822.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

JOURDAIN, E., M. GAUTHIER-CLERC, D. BICOUT, AND P. SABATIER. 2007a. Bird migration routes and risk for pathogen dispersion into western Mediterranean wetlands. Emerging Infectious Diseases 13: 365–372.[Medline]

———, Y. TOUSSAINT, A. LEBLOND, D. BICOUT, P. SABATIER, AND M. GAUTHIER-CLERC. 2007b. Bird species potentially involved in introduction, amplification and spread of West Nile Virus in a Mediterranean wetland, the Camargue (southern France). Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 7: 15–33.

MORISHITA, T. Y., P. P. AYE, E. C. LEY, AND B. S. HARR. 1999. Survey of pathogens and blood parasites in free-living passerines. Avian Diseases 43: 549–552.[Medline]

LI, C., K. YU, G. TIAN, D. YU, L. LIU, B. JING, J. PING, AND H. CHEN. 2005. Evolution of H9N2 influenza viruses from domestic poultry in mainland China. Virology 340: 70–83.[Medline]

OBENAUER, J. C., J. DENSON, P. K. MEHTA, X. SU, S. MUKATIRA, D. B. FINKELSTEIN, X. XU, J. WANG, J. MA, F. YIPING, K. M. RAKESTRAW, R. G. WEBSTER, E. HOFFMANN, S. KRAUSS, J. ZHENG, Z. ZHANG, AND C. W. NAEVE. 2006. Large-scale analysis of avian influenza isolates. Science 311: 1576–1580.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

OLSEN, B., V. J. MUNSTER, A. WALLENSTEN, J. WALDENSTROM, A. D. M. E. OSTERHAUS, AND R. A. M. FOUCHIER. 2006. Global patterns of influenza A virus in wild birds. Science 312: 384–388.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

PEIRIS, M., K. Y. YUEN, C. W. LEUNG, K. H. CHAN, P. L. IP, R. W. LAI, W. K. ORR, AND K. F. SHORTRIDGE. 1999. Human infection with influenza H9N2. Lancet 354: 916–917.[Medline]

SCHNEBEL, B., DIERSCHKE, V., RAUTENSCHLEIN, S., AND M. RYLL. 2005. No detection of avian influenza A viruses of the subtypes H5 and H7 and isolation of lentogenic avian paramyxovirus serotype 1 in passerine birds during stopover in the year 2001 on the island Helgoland (North Sea). Deutsche Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 112: 456–460.

STALLKNECHT, D. E., AND S. M. SHANE. 1988. Host range of avian influenza virus in free-living birds. Veterinary Research Communications 12: 125–141.[Medline]

———, M. T. KEARNEY, S. M. SHANE, AND P. J. ZWANK. 1990. Effects of pH, temperature, and salinity on persistence of avian influenza viruses in water. Avian Diseases 34: 412–428.[Medline]

WEBSTER, R. G., W. J. BEAN, O. T. GORMAN, T. M. CHAMBERS, AND Y. KAWAOKA. 1992. Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Microbiological Reviews 56: 152–179.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

XU, K. M., K. S. LI, G. J. D. SMITH, J. W. LI, H. TAI, J. X. ZHANG, R. G. WEBSTER, J. S. M. PEIRIS, H. CHEN, AND Y. GUAN. 2007. Evolution and molecular epidemiology of H9N2 influenza viruses from quail in southern China, 2000 to 2005. Journal of Virology 81: 2635–2645.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Received for publication 7 November 2006.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lebarbenchon, C.
Right arrow Articles by Gauthier-Clerc, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lebarbenchon, C.
Right arrow Articles by Gauthier-Clerc, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS