|
|
||||||||
SHORT COMMUNICATION |
1 Institute for Breeding and Health Care of Wild Animals, Fishes and Bees, University of Ljubljana, Veterinary Faculty, Gerbiceva 60, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2 Institute for Health Care of Pigs, University of Ljubljana, Veterinary Faculty, Gerbiceva 60, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
3 Corresponding author (email: gorazd.vengust{at}vf.uni-lj.si)
ABSTRACT:
Serum samples from 427 hunter-killed wild boar (Sus scrofa) from Slovenia were tested for antibodies to Aujeszkys disease virus (ADV). Samples were collected throughout Slovenia and corresponded to 6.2% of the total harvest. Antibodies against ADV were detected in 111 sera (26%) using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Antibody prevalence increased significantly with age. This report describes the first evidence of ADV infection in wild boar populations in Slovenia.
Key words: Antibodies, Aujeszkys disease, pseudorabies virus, Slovenia, Sus scrofa, wild boar.
The wild boar (Sus scrofa) is one of the most important big game species in Slovenia, with an annual harvest approximating 6,000 animals per year. The population density of wild boars in Slovenia has increased dramatically during the past decade despite a harvest that has increased by 10% per year.
Aujeszkys disease is an economically important disease of domestic pigs, for which several European countries and the USA have implemented national eradication programs. The causative agent, Aujeszkys disease virus (ADV; Suid herpesvirus 1), belongs to the genus Varicellovirus in family Herpesviridae. Infections in domestic swine can result in fatal encephalitis in newborn pigs, mild or subclinical infections in older animals (Tozzini et al., 1982; Romero et al., 2001), and abortion in pregnant sows (Baskerville, 1981); survivors are latently infected. Feral swine are a recognized reservoir of ADV (Kirkpatrick et al., 1980; Nettles and Erickson, 1984; Van der Leek et al., 1993; Capua et al., 1997; Lipowski, 2003) and thus represent a possible source for infection of domestic swine (Corn et al., 1986; Pirtle et al., 1989; Corn et al., 2004). The importance of this reservoir will increased with the successful eradication of ADV from domestic swine.
Antibodies to ADV and the isolation of this virus have been reported from wild boar in Europe (Cromwijk, 1995; Capua et al., 1997; Albina et al., 2000; Vicente et al., 2002; Zupancic et al., 2002; Lutz et al., 2003), North America (Nettles and Erickson, 1984; Pirtle et al., 1989; Van der Leek et al., 1993; Gresham et al., 2002; Corn et al., 2004), and North Africa (Jridi et al., 1996). This is the first report of antibodies to ADV in wild boar from Slovenia.
Blood samples were collected from 427 hunter-killed wild boar throughout Slovenia during 2003 and 2004. Animals were aged as juveniles (<1 yr) or adults (>1 yr). Blood was collected into sterile tubes and transferred to the laboratory. Serum was separated by centrifugation, and samples were frozen at 20 C until they were tested for antibodies to ADV with a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (SvanovirTM PRV-gB-Ab, Svanova Biotech AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Statistical analyses for potential sex and age effects on antibody prevalence were performed by
2.
Of 427 serum samples tested by ELISA, 111 (26%) were positive for antibodies to ADV. Antibodies were detected in all age groups and both sexes. Seropositive animals were located in the east, southeast, and northeast of Slovenia (Fig. 1
). Antibody prevalence was significantly lower in juveniles (7%) than adults (34%) (
2 = 31.33, df = 1, P<0.0000001), and these age-class differences were consistent within sexes (juveniles: male 6%, female 9%; adults: male 35%, female 32%). Using Bayes formula (Papoulis, 1984), we can predict with 92% probability that an infected animal belonged to the adult age group. A difference in antibody prevalence was not detected between males (26%) and females (26%) (
2 = 0.0193, df = 1, P = 0.8894).
|
Detection of antibodies against ADV in wild boar in our study supports the hypothesis that these animals are a reservoir for ADV and that they represent a potential source of infection to domestic pigs. Infected wild boar may also represent a potential source of ADV to other wildlife species, such as wild canids, as well as hunting dogs (Tozzini et al., 1982). Mortality associated with ADV has been documented in endangered species including the Florida panther (Felis concolor) in the USA (Glass et al., 1994) and Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) from Sierra Morena in Spain (Vicente et al., 2002). ADV has also been suggested as a possible contributing factor in a declining number of Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in Slovenia. In Slovenia, lynx occupy regions where seropositive wild boar were detected in our study. Understanding potential problems associated with transmission of ADV between species will require further study.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the hunters whose cooperation has made these studies possible. The research was funded with a grant from the Veterinary Administration of the Republic of Slovenia.
ALBINA, E., A. MESPLEDE, G. CHENUT, M. F. Le POTIER, G. BOURBAO, S. LE GAL, AND Y. LEFORBAN. 2000. A serological survey on classical swine fever (CSF), Aujeszkys disease (AD) and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus infections in French wild boars from 1991 to 1998. Veterinary Microbiology 77: 4357.[Medline]
BASKERVILLE, A. 1981. Aujeszkys disease: Recent advances and current problems. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 29: 183189.[Medline]
CAPUA, I., C. CASACCIA, G. CALZETTA, AND V. CAPORALE. 1997. Characterisation of Aujeszkys disease viruses isolated from domestic animals and from a wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Italy between 1972 and 1995. Veterinary Microbiology 57: 143149.[Medline]
CORN, J. L., P. K. SWIDEREK, B. O. BLACKBURN, G. A. ERICKSON, A. B. THIERMANN, AND V. F. NETTLES. 1986. Survey of selected diseases in wild swine in Texas. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 189: 10291032.[Medline]
, D. E. STALLKNECHT, N. M. MECHLIN, M. P. LUTTRELL, AND J. R. FISCHER. 2004. Persistence of pseudorabies virus in feral swine populations. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 40: 307310.
CROMWIJK, W.A.J. 1995. Serological investigation on wild boar in the Veluwe region of the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Diergeneeskunde 120: 364365.[Medline]
GLASS, C. M., R. G. MCLEAN, J. B. KATZ, D. S. MAEHR, C. B. CROPP, L. J. KIRK, A. J. MCKEIRNAN, AND J. F. EVERMANN. 1994. Isolation of pseudorabies (Aujeszkys-disease) virus from a Florida panther. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 30: 180184.[Abstract]
GRESHAM, C. S., C. A. GRESHAM, M. J. DUFFY, C. T. FAULKNER, AND S. PATTON. 2002. Increased prevalence of Brucella suis and pseudorabies virus antibodies in adults of an isolated feral swine population in coastal South Carolina. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 38: 653656.[Abstract]
JRIDI, M., H. BOUZGHAIA, AND B. TOMA. 1996. Aujeszkys disease in wild boar in Tunisia. Epidemioligie et Sante Animal 30: 99105. [In French].
KIRKPATRICK, C. M., C. L. KANITZ, AND S. M. MCCROCKLIN. 1980. Possible Role of wild mammals in transmission of pseudorabies to swine. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 16: 601614.[Abstract]
LIPOWSKI, A. 2003. European wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) as a reservoir of infectious diseases for domestic pigs. Medycyna Weterynaryjna 59: 861863.
LUTZ, W., D. JUNGHANS, AND D. SCHMITZ. 2003. A long-term survey of pseudorabies virus infections in European wild boar of western Germany. Zeitschrift fur Jagdwissenschaft 49: 130140.
MULLER, T., J. TEUFFERT, K. ZIEDLER, C. POSSARDT, M. KRAMER, C. STAUBACH, AND F. J. CONRATHS. 1998. Pseudorabies in the European wild boar from Eastern Germany. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 34: 251258.[Abstract]
NETTLES, V. F., AND G. A. ERICKSON. 1984. Pseudorabies in wild swine. Proceedings of the United States Animal Health Association 88: 505506.
PAPOULIS, A. 1984. Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, 583 pp.
PIRTLE, E. C., J. M. SACKS, V. F. NETTLES, E. A. ROIIOR. 1989. Prevalence and transmission of pseudorabies virus in an isolated population of feral swine. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 25: 605607.[Abstract]
ROMERO, C. H., P. N. MEADE, J. E. SHULTZ, H. Y. CHUNG, E. P. GIBBS, E. C. HAHN, AND G. LOLLIS. 2001. Venereal transmission of pseudorabies viruses indigenous to feral swine Journal of Wildlife Diseases 37: 289296.[Abstract]
TOZZINI, F., A. POLI, AND G. DELLACROCE. 1982. Experimental-infection of European wild swine (Susscrofa L) with pseudorabies virus. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 18: 425428.[Abstract]
VAN DER LEEK, M. L., H. N. BECKER, E. C. PIRTLE, P. HUMPHREY, C. L. ADAMS, B. P. ALL, G. A. ERICKSON, R. C. BELDEN, W. B. FRANKENBERGER, AND E.P.J. GIBBS. 1993. Prevalence of pseudorabies (Aujeszkys-disease) virus-antibodies in feral swine in Florida. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 29: 403409.[Abstract]
VICENTE, J., L. LEON-VIZCAINO, C. GORTAZAR, M. J. CUBERO, M. GONZALEZ, AND P. MARTIN-ATANCE. 2002. Antibodies to selected viral and bacterial pathogens in European wild boars from southcentral Spain. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 38: 649652.[Abstract]
ZUPANCIC, Z, B. JUKIC, M. LOJKIC, Z. CAC, L. JEMERSIC, AND V. STARESINA. 2002. Prevalence of antibodies to classical swine fever, Aujeszkys disease, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome, and bovine viral diarrhoea viruses in wild boars in Croatia. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series B: Infectious Diseases and Veterinary Public Health 49: 253256.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Sedlak, E. Bartova, and J. Machova Antibodies to Selected Viral Disease Agents in Wild Boars from the Czech Republic J. Wildl. Dis., July 1, 2008; 44(3): 777 - 780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |