|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, 105 Magruder Hall, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA
2 US Department of AgricultureAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, National Veterinary Services Laboratories, 1800 Dayton Road, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA
3 US Department of AgricultureAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, 530 Center St. NE #335, Salem, Oregon 97301, USA
4 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2040 SE Marine Science Drive, Newport, Oregon 97365, USA
5 Corresponding author (email: Rob.Bildfell{at}oregonstate.edu)
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key words: Alopecia, Columbian black-tailed deer, Damalinia (Cervicola), Demodex odocoilei, hair loss, lice, Odocoileus hemionus columbianus, parasites, pediculosis.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals with hair-loss syndrome (HLS) are usually thin or emaciated with loss of pelage over the thorax, flanks, and hindquarters (Fig. 1
). This loss of hair often is perceived first as a change in coat color, probably due to removal of outer guard hairs and thinning of hair coat. The pattern of hair loss is commonly asymmetric. If the condition progresses, animals may gain a "barbered" appearance as the hair is groomed to short stubble. Eventually, bald patches of skin may develop. Deer with HLS may engage in excessive grooming or rubbing but otherwise remain alert and active. Severely affected deer may become progressively weaker and die. Conversely, some HLS deer have been observed to recover and regrow a normal hair coat.
|
Recorded sightings of HLS deer in Oregon during the past 5 yr indicate a distinct seasonality. Frequency is greatest in winter and spring, with few reports of HLS animals in summer or early fall. Affected deer populations include many seemingly healthy animals. Fawns and does are most often affected by HLS; mature bucks with HLS are seen infrequently. Deer between 6 mo and 12 mo of age seem especially prone to the condition. Estimates of the prevalence of HLS within different wildlife management units of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) are confounded by variation between observers and by lack of a strict case definition. Spotlight surveys conducted in one unit during MarchApril of 2003 found 52.5% of observed deer (n = 221) had some degree of hair loss (ODFW, unpubl. data). An average prevalence of 23.9% (n=1,202) across wildlife management units in northwest Oregon was observed in spring 2003. In 2000, estimates of the percentage of HLS-affected adult deer in various western Washington counties ranged from 0% to 60%, while the percentage of affected fawns ranged from 20% to 80% (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2001). Field observations by Oregon and Washington state biologists suggest that HLS occurs infrequently above 600 m elevation. Affected deer are seen in all major habitat types of western Oregon and Washington, including coastal bays, coastal mountains, central valley agricultural land, and urban areas.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals were identified as appropriate for the study based on the pattern of alopecia, poor body condition, and confirmation of death within the preceding 24 hr. Animals were classified as juvenile or adult based on body size, dentition, and antler growth. Internal or external lesions were noted.
Ectoparasites and sections of skin were collected and submitted to the National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL, United States Department of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa, USA) for parasite identification. Our louse identifications follow the classification scheme of Lyal (1985). Sections of skin, each approximately 4 cm2, were harvested from the dorsum, rump, muzzle, distal hind limb, shoulder, flank, groin, and proximal ear of three deer (numbers 17, 19, and 21) and fixed in 70% ethanol. Adult lice, nymphs, and nits within 1-cm2 subsamples from these sections were subsequently counted under a dissecting microscope in order to estimate the distribution and intensity of lice infestation. Voucher specimens of lice are in the NVSL parasitology reference collection (accession numbers 86310, 215165, 217860, and 227557). Archived specimens of chewing lice collected from O. hemionus in the Pacific Northwest were borrowed from various collections for comparison with current louse specimens. Pertinent lice were from the US National Parasite Collection (US Department of Agriculture [USDA], Beltsville, Maryland, USA) and the Spencer Entomology Museum (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada).
Feces from each carcass were analyzed by flotation (Whitlock, 1948) to obtain a crude estimate of the number of gastrointestinal parasites. Estimated counts were made of adult lungworms within major airways. Those animals with less than 50 intrabronchial worms were considered to have a low lungworm burden, whereas those with lungworm numbers greater than 50 were believed to have high-intensity infections. These ranges were based on Kistner and Denney (1990). When summarizing surveys they performed during 197290, these researchers stated that 50 lungworms (Dictyocaulus sp.) was a typical parasite load in western Oregon deer. Adult lungworms collected from the bronchi of deer 18 and 20 were submitted to the US National Parasite Collection (voucher specimens 92710 and 92711) for identification using both morphologic and DNA probe methodologies (Jansen and Borgsteede, 1990; Divina et al., 2000).
Bacterial cultures of selected gross lesions were performed by inoculation of blood agar and McConkeys medium. Virus isolation was attempted on five animals (deer 1, 710). For each of these, samples of lung, kidney, lymph node, liver, and spleen were pooled, homogenized, and then inoculated onto a variety of cell culture monolayers, including BTD kidney, BTD testicle, bovine turbinate, and Vero (MARU) cells (Oregon State University Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory and National Veterinary Sciences Laboratory, Ames, Iowa).
Various tissues were collected for histopathology (including at least skin and lung). Tissue samples were immersed in 10% formalin for at least 24 hr and then routinely processed for embedding in paraffin. Tissue sections (7 µm thick) were subsequently stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined microscopically.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Mites were found in hair follicles of four animals by histopathology. These mites were morphologically indistinguishable from Demodex odocoilei, a parasite of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) (Desch and Nutting, 1974; Desch, pers. comm.). To our knowledge, Demodex have not been described previously in BTD. The species of Damalinia found on HLS deer was not found in any of the archival specimens examined. These archival specimens included the anticipated Damalinia (Tricholipeurus) lipeuroides and Damalinia (Tricholipeurus) parallela (Emerson et al., 1984), as well as samples of Bovicola tibialis, a species normally associated with Old World cervids (Lyal, 1985).
Results of fecal flotations are shown in Table 1
. The mean number of nematode eggs (all species) per gram of feces was 498 (range = 252,625). Samples from five animals had coccidian oocysts (
=218/g; range = 502,175), and five had cestode eggs (
= 490/g; r = 350950).
The lungworms in major airways were identified morphologically as Dictyocaulus eckerti, which until recently has often been confused with Dictyocaulus viviparus (E. Hoberg, pers. comm.). This identification was confirmed by gene sequence analysis.
Streptococcus spp. was isolated from an arthritic joint and subcutaneous abscess (deer 2), Escherichia coli from lung abscesses (deer 5), and Pasteurella multocida from the pneumonic lung of deer 14. None of the virus isolation cultures yielded any growth.
Microscopic changes in skin sections from severe hair-loss areas typically included moderate epidermal thickening and orthokeratotic hyperkeratosis with only minor dermal inflammation. In more acutely affected areas, crusts of degenerate eosin-ophils and parakeratotic debris were also visible (Fig. 4
). Foci of epidermal erosion or ulceration were accompanied by local accumulations of eosinophils and neutrophils. A perivascular to diffuse dermatitis with eosinophils, mast cells, neutrophils, and fewer lymphocytes and plasma cells was present in these acutely inflamed areas (Fig. 5
). Although telogen and catagen phase hair follicles tended to predominate, anagen follicles also were visible. Adnexa were unremarkable. Multiple tangential sections of lice typically appeared on the skin surface (Fig. 4
), where hair shafts still remained. In two juveniles (deer 3 and 14), multiple Demodex mites were in most follicles of multiple skin sections, accompanied by a mild lymphoplasmacytic perifolliculitis. Skin samples from the heads of deer 2 and 9 also contained a few intra-follicular mites but lacked any associated cellular response. Other less consistent skin changes included foci of pyoderma (deer 3, 7, 8, and 14) and dermatophytosis (deer 9 and 14).
|
|
Sections of peripheral nerves (brachial plexus or sciatic nerve) often contained foci of perineuritis due to eosinophils, lymphocytes, and plasma cells, which is consistent with lesions attributed to P. odocoilei (Pybus and Samuel, 1984; Lankester, 2001). Peripheral lymph nodes were generally enlarged due to lymphoid follicular hyperplasia and medullary plasmacytosis. Lymph node sinusoidal spaces often contained small numbers of eosinophils. Other microscopic lesions seen in more than one animal included intramuscular sarco-cysts and mild multifocal lymphoplasmacytic interstitial nephritis.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The key element in our hypothesis is that we believe the Damalinia (Cervicola) sp. we found on affected deer is not native to the Pacific Northwest and is thus a new parasite for BTD. All known species of Damalinia (Cervicola) occur only on deer and antelope in the Eastern Hemisphere (Lyal, 1987); none has been adequately and conclusively documented previously in the Americas. However, one of us has identified a similar or identical louse from white-tailed deer in several locations throughout the southeastern United States, (J. Mertins, unpubl. data). One potential route for introduction of this louse to North America is comingling of exotic and native cervids. Such parasite transfers have been recognized for several cervid parasites (Hoberg et al., 2001), and this phenomenon has been documented for a chewing louse infestation of BTD in California (Westrom et al., 1976). These authors found the exotic louse B. tibialis transferred from captive fallow deer (Dama dama) to BTD, and it predominated on the only animal coinfested with both native and exotic lice that was studied. The introduction of other nonnative lice to North America via importation of wild ungulates seems highly likely (Durden, 2001).
It is possible that Damalinia (Cervicola) sp. has been present but misidentified for some time in the Pacific Northwest. Published records of chewing lice on deer in the region are few (Hopkins, 1960; Walker and Becklund, 1970; Emerson et al., 1984) and difficult to confirm. Nevertheless, reexamination of a number of collections (Table 2
) failed to find Damalinia (Cervicola) (J. Mertins, unpubl. data). Except for two mule deer, all hosts were BTD originating in insular or coastal areas of British Columbia or Oregon. Nearly all identified lice were the two typical chewing lice of deer from North America, D. (T.) lipeuroides or D. (T.) parallela.
|
We are aware of only one published study of pediculosis in BTD. Cowan (1946) examined the health of 40 wild deer taken on southern Vancouver Island (British Columbia) and found that chewing lice were among the most universally present parasites. Cowan commented that thrifty deer supported small populations of lice, but unhealthy deer had heavy louse infestations, with all life stages distributed evenly over the long-haired regions of the body. He further described the physical condition and behavior of such deer in a manner that befits HLS. The lice were identified as an unspecified mixture of D. lipeuroides and D. (T.) parallela. Unfortunately, the accuracy of Cowans results may be compromised by misidentification of at least some of his lice. We have examined some of Cowans voucher specimens (Table 2
), and specifically those from a Salt Spring Island BTD were the exotic louse, B. tibialis, and not D. lipeuroides. From the context and sparse details of Cowans paper, one cannot positively determine how many of his louse collections may have been misidentified. Lice collected by J. G. Spencer (Table 2
), which were also misidentified, confirm that B. tibialis was present on Vancouver Island during this time period. Thus, it is possible that some of the more severe cases of pediculosis reported by Cowan were actually caused by B. tibialis.
Another element of the pediculosis observations of Cowan (1946) that bears comparison to the present study is his characterization of louse densities. For an unstated number of hosts, he did counts of lice on five 6.54-cm2 pieces of hide per animal. Furthermore, he estimated the approximate surface area of a small deer to be 6,542 cm2. Cowan cites only the maximal mean louse density he encountered, 21.4 lice/cm2, although he does not state whether these counts include nits. Thus, on two unspecified yearling deer in very poor condition, he observed a maximal intensity of 140,000 lice per host animal. Whether the lice on these particular animals were the endemic or the extant exotic species cannot be determined from available evidence. Westrom et al. (1976) found a maximum of 8,200 B. tibialis lice on a BTD but did not comment on the health consequences of this pediculosis. However, other studies on the effects of D. (T.) lipeuroides and D. (T.) parallela on their hosts (primarily with respect to white-tailed deer) suggest that even substantial infestations (e.g., up to 70,550 lice/animal) may not be very pathogenic (Samuel and Trainer, 1971; Watson and Anderson, 1975; Samuel et al., 1980). Calculations like that of Cowan (1946), using the density counts (including nits) made on three BTD in the present study, yield intensities of 378,100, 1,243,900, and 1,493,600 lice per animal. Even discounting the observed nits, these animals sustained estimated infestations of 243,400, 308,100, and 738,600 lice per animal, respectively.
Introductions of parasites and pathogens to new host populations have become increasingly common due to changing patterns of human and animal movements, changes in husbandry practices, and continuing environmental disruptions (Hoberg, 1997; Brown, 1999). Naive species lack appropriate immune responses to these agents and often suffer devastating effects when exposed. We speculate that Damalinia (Cervicola) is an Old World louse that transferred from another species of cervid, but its primary host remains unknown. Many instances of inadvertent importation of ectoparasites on exotic wildlife have been documented, typically involving organisms much more visible than chewing lice (United States Animal Health Association, 1998). Heterospecific transfer of chewing lice is uncommon (Hopkins, 1949; Durden, 2001) because their entire life cycle is generally completed on the host. Nevertheless, disease resulting from the heterospecific transfer of both chewing and sucking lice to cervids has been documented (Brunetti and Cribbs, 1971; Westrom et al., 1976; Foreyt et al., 1986). Chewing lice are generally not considered important pathogens of domestic or wild animals, principally because these parasites tend to feed superficially on hair, keratin, and surface secretions. It is also likely that a mutual accommodation has evolved between lice and their healthy, normal hosts. However, disease in cervids has resulted from severe infestations of sucking lice from other hosts (Brunetti and Cribbs, 1971; Foreyt et al., 1986). Poor health and decreased rate of gain have been associated with combined infestations of sucking and chewing lice in cattle (Kettle, 1974; Yager and Scott, 1993), and chewing lice are an important cause of decreased wool quality in sheep (Wilkinson et al., 1982; Yager and Scott, 1993; James, 1999). Ectoparasites are known to cause alopecia in various wildlife species. Winter tick syndrome in moose (Alces alces) results in debilitation, alopecia, and even death (McLaughlin and Addison, 1986). Sarcoptic mange is known to cause alopecia, loss of body condition, and death in a variety of species, including the chamois (Rubicapra rubicapra), ibex (Capra ibex), red fox (Vulpes vulpes), lynx (Lynx lynx), and others (Bornstein et al., 2001). The more serious mange outbreaks are generally associated with the exposure of a naive population, as we propose is the case for the Pacific Northwest BTD.
Some of the cutaneous lesions of HLS specimens are consistent with hypersensitivity, and such an inflammatory response could be a significant drain on the resources of affected deer. It is more likely that the indirect effects of pediculosis, such as decreased feeding time due to pruritis or decreased thermoregulatory ability due to hair loss, are key factors in the syndrome. Such consequences may be especially important to any BTD that have minimal energy reserves due to poor quality winter browse and to animals carrying large numbers of endoparasites.
The preponderance of juveniles in the present study reflects field observations but also may be biased by the reluctance of biologists to euthanize does. The skewed sex ratio of studied animals (76% males) was unanticipated but may simply reflect the small sample size. Four of 21 HLS animals (deer 4, 5, 13, and 14) were affected by life-threatening disease processes other than parasitism/emaciation, and a further five had minor problems, such as subcutaneous abscesses or focal arthritis.
It is possible that HLS increases mortality and/or decreases fecundity in BTD populations, but appropriate studies are yet to be done. Annual counts of fawns per 100 does in one management district have revealed an association between the emergence of HLS and changes in population demographics. Fall counts dropped from 59 per 100 in 1996 (before HLS) to 39 per 100 in 2002. The corresponding spring surveys yielded a decline from 69 per 100 to 22 per 100 does (unpubl. data).
This louse probably can infest mule deer (O. hemionus hemionus), and experiments are planned to test this hypothesis. Efforts are also under way to determine the geographic range of the louse in both Oregon and Washington. Unless an immunosuppressive component is critical to the pathogenesis of HLS, some degree of effective host immune response should begin to develop in the BTD population over time. It will be interesting to observe whether this host-parasite relationship develops a less pathogenic equilibrium. The management implications of HLS await further field studies to determine whether HLS has a causal relationship with overall population numbers and age demographics.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BROWN, C. 1999. Emerging diseases of animals. In Emerging infections, W. M. Scheld, W. A. Craig, and J. M. Hughes (eds.). ASM Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 153163.
BRUNETTI, O., AND H. CRIBBS. 1971. California deer deaths due to massive infestation by the louse (Linognathus africanus). California Fish and Game 57: 138153.
COWAN, I. M. 1946. Parasites, diseases, injuries, and anomalies of the Columbian black-tailed deer, Odocoileus hemionus columbianus (Richardson), in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Research, Section D 24: 71103.
DESCH, C. F., AND W. B. NUTTING. 1974. Demodex odocoilei sp. nov. from the white-tailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 52: 735739.
DIVINA, B. P., E. WILHELMSSON, J. G. MATTSSON, P. WALLER, AND J. HOGLUND. 2000. Identification of Dictyocaulus spp. in ruminants by molecular and morphological analyses. Parasitology 121: 193201.
DOBRORUKA, L. J. 1975. Wirtsrassen von Cervicola meyeri (Taschenberg, 1882) (Mallophaga: Trichodectidae). Vestník C eskoslovenské Spolec nosti Zoologické 39: 251253.
DUNGWORTH, D. L. 1993. The respiratory system. In Pathology of domestic animals, Vol. 2. 4th Edition, K. V. F. Jubb, P. C. Kennedy, and N. C. Palmer (eds.). Academic Press Inc., San Diego, California, pp. 677680.
DURDEN, L. 2001. Lice (Phthiraptera). In Parasitic diseases of wild mammals, W. M. Samuel, M. J. Pybus, and A. A. Kocan (eds.). Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, pp. 317.
EMERSON, K. C., C. MASER, AND J. O. WHITAKER, JR. 1984. Lice (Mallophaga and Anoplura) from mammals of Oregon. Northwest Science 58: 153161.
FOREYT, W. J., D. H. RICE, AND K. C. KIM. 1986. Pediculosis of mule deer and white-tailed deer fawns in captivity. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 189: 11721173.[Medline]
HOBERG, E. P. 1997. Parasite diversity and emerging pathogens: A role for systematics in limiting impacts on genetic resources. In Global genetic resources: Access, ownership and intellectual property rights, K. E. Hoagland and A. Y. Rossman (eds.). Association of Systematics Collections, Washington, D.C., pp. 7183.
,A. A. KOCAN, AND L. G. RICKARD. 2001. Gastrointestinal strongyles in wild ruminants. In Parasitic diseases of wild mammals, W. M. Samuel, M. J. Pybus, and A. A. Kocan (eds.). Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, pp. 193227.
HOPKINS, G. H. E. 1949. The host-associations of the lice of mammals. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 119: 387604.
, 1960. Notes on some Mallophaga from mammals. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Entomology) 10: 7799.
JAMES, P. J. 1999. Do sheep regulate the size of their mallophagan louse populations? International Journal for Parasitology 29: 869875.[Medline]
JANSEN, J., AND F. H. BORGSTEEDE. 1990. Dictyocaulus species, lungworms in cattle and deer in The Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Diergenees-kunde 115: 155158.[Medline]
KETTLE, P. R. 1974. The influence of cattle lice (Damalinia bovis and Linognathus vituli) on weight gain in beef animals. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 22: 1011.[Medline]
KISTNER, T. P., AND S. R. DENNEY. 1990. Final report to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Columbia white tailed deer study, Douglas County, Oregon.
LANKESTER, M. W. 2001. Extrapulmonary lung-worms of cervids. In Parasitic diseases of wild mammals, W. M. Samuel, M. J. Pybus, and A. A. Kocan (eds.). Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, pp. 228278.
LYAL, C. H. C. 1985. A cladistic analysis and classification of trichodectid mammal lice (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera). Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Entomology) 51: 187346.
1987. Co-evolution of trichodectid lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) and their mammalian hosts. Journal of Natural History 21: 128.
MARSHALL, A. G. 1981. The sex ratio of ectoparasitic insects. Ecological Entomology 6: 155174.
MCLAUGHLIN, R. F., AND E. M. ADDISON. 1986. Tick (Dermacentor albipictus)-induced winter hair-loss in captive moose (Alces alces) Journal of Wildlife Diseases 22: 502510.[Abstract]
NAGORSEN, D. 1990. The mammals of British Columbia: A taxonomic catalogue. Royal British Columbia Museum Memoirs 41: 1148.
PYBUS, M. J., AND W. M. SAMUEL. 1984. Lesions caused by Parelaphostrongylus odocoilei (Nematoda: Metastrongyoidea) in two cervid hosts. Veterinary Pathology 21: 425431.[Abstract]
SAMUEL, W. M., AND D. O. TRAINER. 1971. Seasonal fluctuations of Tricholipeurus parallelus (Osborn, 1896) (Mallophaga: Trichodectidae) on white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus [Zimmermann, 1780]) from South Texas. American Midland Naturalist 85: 507513.
E. R. GRINNELL, AND A. J. KENNEDY. 1980. Ectoparasites (Mallophaga, Anoplura, Acari) on mule deer, Odocoileus hemionus, and white-tailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus, of Alberta, Canada. Journal of Medical Entomology 17: 1517.
SHACKLETON, D. 1999. Hoofed mammals of British Columbia. University of British Columbia Press/Royal British Columbia Museum, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 268 pp.
UNITED STATES ANIMAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION. 1998. Foreign pests and vectors of arthropod-borne diseases. In Foreign animal diseases, Carter Printing Company, Richmond, Virginia, pp. 225224.
WALKER, M. L., AND W. W. BECKLUND. 1970. Checklist of the internal and external parasites of deer, Odocoileus hemionus and O. virginianus, in the United States and Canada. Index-Catalog of Medical and Veterinary Zoology, Special Publication 1: 145.
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE. 2001. Hair Loss Syndrome: Region 5. Vancover, Washington, pp. 14.
WATSON, T. G., AND R. C. ANDERSON. 1975. Seasonal changes in louse populations on white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Canadian Journal of Zoology 53: 10471054.[Medline]
WESTROM, D. R., B. C. NELSON, AND G. E. CONNOLLY. 1976. Transfer of Bovicola tibialis (Piaget) (Mallophaga: Trichodectidae) from the introduced fallow deer to the Columbian black-tailed deer in California. Journal of Medical Entomology 13: 169173.[Medline]
WHITLOCK, H. V. 1948. Some modifications of the McMaster helminth egg-counting technique and apparatus. Australian Council of Scientific and Industrial Research 21: 177180.
WILKINSON, F. C., C. G. CHANEET, AND B. R. BEETSON. 1982. Growth of populations of lice, Damalinia ovis, on sheep and their effects on production and processing performance of wool. Veterinary Parasitology 9: 243252.[Medline]
YAGER, J. A., AND D. W. SCOTT. 1993. The skin and appendages. In Pathology of domestic animals, Vol. 1. 4th Edition, K. V. F. Jubb, P. C. Kennedy, and N. C. Palmer (eds.). Academic Press Inc., San Diego, California, pp. 679688.
Received for publication 9 October 2003.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. D. Colwell, D. Gray, K. Morton, and M. Pybus Nasal Bots and Lice from White-tailed Deer in Southern Alberta, Canada J. Wildl. Dis., July 1, 2008; 44(3): 687 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-L. Gentes, H. Proctor, and G. Wobeser Demodicosis in a Mule Deer (Odocoileus hemionus hemionus) from Saskatchewan, Canada J. Wildl. Dis., October 1, 2007; 43(4): 758 - 761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Mortenson, A. Abrams, B. M. Rosenthal, D. Dunams, E. P. Hoberg, R. J. Bildfell, and R. L. Green Parelaphostrongylus odocoilei in columbian black-tailed deer from Oregon. J. Wildl. Dis., July 1, 2006; 42(3): 527 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |