JWD Your personal alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 40(1), 2004, pp. 137-140
© Wildlife Disease Association  2004
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ziman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Stedman, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ziman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Stedman, B.

SHORT COMMUNICATION

Haemoproteus spp. and Leukocytozoon spp. in a Captive Raptor Population

Melanie Ziman, Angela Colagross-Schouten, Stephen Griffey and Bret Stedman

University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, USA
Corresponding author (email: meziman{at}ucdavis.edu)

ABSTRACT:   Raptors are commonly infected with two blood parasites of the family Haemoproteidae, Haemoproteus spp. and Leukocytozoon spp. To determine if age or length of time in captivity influence prevalence of Haemoproteus spp. and Leukocytozoon spp. infection in captive raptors, blood samples were collected from 55 birds from April 1999 to May 2000. Blood smears were examined for parasitemia and influence of age and length of time in captivity at the time of sample collection were compared. We found juvenile and adult birds were more likely to be infected with Leukocytozoon spp. than were nestlings (P = 0.006) and birds present for >365 days were more likely to be infected with Haemoproteus spp. and/or Leukocytozoon spp. than were birds captive for <365 days.
  Key words:  Haemoproteus, Leukocytozoon, parasite, raptor.

Resistance to blood parasites in birds may be genetic or may be more prevalent in birds from certain locations (Ricklefs, 1992). Additionally, resistance may be associated with age, as older birds may have an acquired immunity (Shutler et al., 1995; Heidenreich, 1997). Parasite prevalence in captive raptors is of interest because, even though these parasites may not be particularly pathogenic to raptors, infected birds may serve as reservoirs for infection for more vulnerable species such as waterfowl. Influence of age and time spent in captivity on Haemoproteus and Leukocytozoon infection in captivity were examined. Haemoproteus and Leukocytozoon are commonly found in birds of prey and are transmissible via biting insects. The life cycle and morphology of Haemoproteus are described by Beynon (1996), Heidenreich (1997), and Apanius (2000). Campbell (1995), Olsen and Gaunt (1985), and Fraser (1991) describe the lifecycle and morphology of Leukocytozoon.

A total of 55 birds were sampled; some birds were bled more than once. A total of 87 samples were evaluated, with 12 samples from birds bled twice and 10 samples from birds bled three times. The study took place at the California Raptor Center (CRC), University of California, Davis, California (USA; 38.529N, 121.761W), from 2 April 1999 to 25 May 2000. Some birds are rehabilitated and released shortly after entering CRC, while nonreleasable birds are used for public education and become permanent residents. All birds sampled were injured or weakened. Age groups included nestlings (<58 days of age), juveniles (1–2 yr of age), and adult birds (>2 yr of age). We also considered whether parasite prevalence in captive raptors differed between short-term birds (present at the CRC for <365 days) and long-term (present for ≥365 days) captive residents. Raptor species sampled included great horned owl (Bubo virginianus), red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), Swainson’s hawk (Buteo swainsoni), northern harrier (Circus cyaneus), golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), barn owl (Tito alba), bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), spotted owl (Strix occidentalis), and barred owl (Strix varia).

Raptors at the CRC were housed with no more than four birds per enclosure; usually one bird was housed per enclosure. Birds were fed once daily a diet of euthanized chicks, mice, or rats and given free access to water. Housing was, in part, made of chain link fence and it was possible for the birds to be exposed to insect vectors.

Blood samples were taken and smears made as described by Tella et al. (1999) with minor differences. Blood was drawn from the medial metatarsal vein and placed into a CBC Monoject® (Kendall Healthcare, Mansfield, Massachusetts, USA) samplette capillary whole-blood collector with potassium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Slides were cover slipped and examined on a Microstar microscope (AO Scientific Instruments, Southbridge, Massachusetts). Larger parasites such as Leukocytozoon, were viewed at 40x and oil immersion (100x) was used to view Haemoproteus. Because speciation of Haemoproteus and Leukocytozoon is difficult based on morphology alone, only the genus was recorded.

Prevalence was calculated by determination of infected or no evidence of parasitemia for each raptor. Overall prevalence was calculated without regard to age or length of time in captivity. Data from all 55 individuals were compared. If a bird was found to be positive in any bleeding, the bird was designated as infected for that parasite. Finally, using the pooled data set, we calculated prevalence based on age class and then length of time in captivity.

Fisher’s exact tests were calculated ({alpha} 0.05) with statistical software (SAS Institute Inc., Carey, North Carolina, USA) for both Haemoproteus and Leukocytozoon infected birds compared to birds without evidence of parasitemia.

Fifty-five birds were sampled; 39 short-term and 16 long-term birds. Days in captivity for short-term birds ranged from 1–244 and the range for long-term birds was 760–5,724 days. Seventy-eight percent (43/55) had Haemoproteus and 35% (19/ 55) had Leukocytozoon. Neither parasite was observed in two birds (4%). Of all birds sampled 47% (26/55) were adults, 9% (5/55) were juveniles, and 44% (24/55) were nestlings. Haemoproteus was found in all 26 adults, all five juveniles, and 88% (21/24) of nestlings. Leukocytozoon was observed in 54% (14/26) adults, 40% (2/5) juveniles, and 13% (3/24) nestlings. Seventy-one percent (39/55) of the birds were in captivity for <365 days. Of these birds, 69% (27/39) were positive for Haemoproteus and 23% (9/39) were positive for Leukocytozoon. Sixteen birds (29%; 16/55) were present for >365 days. Of these birds, all 16 had Haemoproteus and 63% (10/16) had Leukocytozoon.

Calculations for infectivity were modified in SAS by valuing infected birds by half if they were bled twice and by 0.3 if they were bled three times (e.g., a bird bled twice has a greater chance of being found positive for either parasite, therefore to make the twice-bled bird’s results equal to a bird that was bled once, we valued it half as much).

Haemoproteus infection was not influenced by age; however adults and juvenile birds were more likely to be infected with Leukocytozoon than nestlings (P = 0.006). Haemoproteus (P = 0.012) and Leukocytozoon (P = 0.011) infections were significantly influenced by captivity for ≥365 days.

Prevalence of Haemoproteus and Leukocytozoon infection of captive raptors in our study was higher than that reported in free-flying birds (Forrester et al., 1994). Possibly, the stress of captivity increased susceptibility to infection (Munoz et al., 1999). However, birds housed at CRC are fed daily and receive medical care, so they may be less stressed in some ways than their free-flying counterparts. Studies conducted on captive raptors have reported similar (Olsen and Gaunt, 1985) and different (Munoz et al., 1999) results compared to ours.

Three nestlings sampled at 17, 84, and 85 days of life at CRC in our study were infected with Haemoproteus. At the CRC, nestlings are placed with foster mothers between 10 and 20 days of life. Raptor hosts may carry gametocytes in their blood in as few as 6 days after being infected and thus may be sources for transmission of the parasite via fly vectors (Shutler et al., 1995). Haemoproteus transmission may increase during the breeding season (Tella et al., 1999), which may be why all three nestlings were infected. We do not know if raptors sampled were infected before being brought into captivity or if they acquired infection during confinement. However, one infected individual introduced into a captive population could serve as a source of infection for other raptors.

The majority of CRC birds sampled (78%) were infected with Haemoproteus. Birds in rehabilitation centers are in close proximity and are weakened which may facilitate transmission. Although immunocompetent raptors tolerate the parasite well (Campbell, 1995), captive raptors infected with parasites of the order Haemosporidia (including Haemoprotues and Leukocytozoon) typically took longer to rehabilitate and had higher mortality than uninfected raptors (Olsen and Gaunt, 1985). Perhaps captive raptors are immunocompromised and are therefore unable to rid themselves of infection, but develop low-grade chronic infection with few signs. Blood smears from some birds sampled more than once were positive for Haemoproteus at one bleeding, Leukocytozoon at another, and sometimes neither parasite was detected. More research is needed to determine the cause for such high Haemoproteus prevalence at the CRC.

Low prevalence of Leukocytozoon (35%) in comparison with Haemoproteus (78%) may be due to decreased numbers of Simulium near human domiciles (Kucera, 1981). Birds at the CRC are housed in enclosures near buildings and facilities. The findings that older birds (adults and juveniles) and birds confined for >1 yr, were more likely to be infected with Leukocytozoon suggest that even if the insect vector is rare around human constructions, infection with the parasite at the CRC may occur over time.

The time in captivity was arbitrarily categorized as longterm or shortterm based on the residency status of the birds included in our study. Also, Leukocytozoon was rarely found more than once on a slide. Thus, due to the low numbers of this parasite in the blood, the actual number of infected birds in this population may have been higher than we reported. To get a more accurate infectivity ranking, we would need to employ use of more sensitive detection techniques, such as PCR or serology, which might provide more accurate estimates of prevalence.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge J. Fraser for her patience and analytical opinion on slides and for providing materials. We also thank V. Joseph and C. Cardona for their answers to questions that arose during the study. We also acknowledge M. Watnik for his assistance in data analysis. This study was funded by the University of California at Davis.

LITERATURE CITED

APANIUS, V. 2000. Island and taxon effects in parasitism and resistance of lesser antillean birds. Ecology 81: 1959–1969.

BENYON, P. H., N. A. FORBES, AND N. H. HARCOURT-BROWN. 1996. Manual of raptors, pigeons and waterfowl. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, 360 pp.

CAMPBELL, T. W. 1995. Avian hematology and cytology. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, pp. 30–33.

FORRESTER, D. J., T. R. SAM, J. R. FOSTER, AND G. FOSTER. 1994. Blood parasites of raptors in Florida. Journal of Raptor Research 28: 226–231.

FRASER, C. Editor. 1991. The Merck veterinary manual, 7th Edition, Merck, Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, 1832 pp.

HEIDENREICH, M. 1997. Birds of prey medicine and management. Blackwell Science Limited, Oxford, UK, pp. 136–137.

KUCERA, J. 1981. Blood parasites of birds in central Europe. 2. Leukocytozoon. Folia Parasitologica 28: 193–203.

MUNOZ, E., D. FERRER, R. MOLINA, AND R. D. ADLARD. 1999. Prevalence of haematozoa in birds of prey in Catalonia, north-east Spain. The Veterinary Record 144: 632–636.[Medline]

OLSEN, G. H., AND S. D. GAUNT. 1985. Effects of hemoprotozoal infections on rehabilitation of wild raptors. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 187: 1204–1205.

O’ROKE, E. C. 1932. The morphology, transmission, and life-history of Haemoprotus lophortyx O’Roke, a blood parasite of the California Valley quail. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.

RICKLEFS, R. E. 1992. Embryonic development period and the prevalence of avian blood parasites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the US 1992: 4722.

SHUTLER, D., G. F. BENNETT, AND M. ADELO. 1995. Sex proportions of Haemoproteus blood parasites and local mate competition. Proclamation National Academy of Science 92: 6748–6752.

TELLA, J. L., G. BLACO, A. MANUELA, J. A. GAJON, DOMAZAR, AND F. HIRALDO. 1999. Habitat, world geographic range and embryonic development of hosts explain the prevalence of avian hematozoa at small spatial and phylogenetic scales. Population Biology 96: 1785–1789.

Received for publication 20 November 2001.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ziman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Stedman, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ziman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Stedman, B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS