JWD
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 45(2), 2009, pp. 430-436
© Wildlife Disease Association  2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dearing, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dearing, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, B. A.

SEASONAL VARIATION IN SIN NOMBRE VIRUS INFECTIONS IN DEER MICE: PRELIMINARY RESULTS

M. Denise Dearing1,2, M. Andrea Previtali1, Jeremy D. Jones1, Patrick W. Ely1 and Britta A. Wood1

Department of Biology, 257 South 1400 East, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
2 Corresponding author (email: denise.dearing{at}utah.edu)

ABSTRACT:   The proportion of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) with recently acquired Sin Nombre virus (SNV) infections is an indicator of epizootic intensity and may be key in predicting outbreaks of hantavirus cardio-pulmonary syndrome in humans. We investigated whether incidence of recent infections was related to season, sex, reproductive status, or habitat disturbance. In May and September, 2006, we sampled 912 deer mice at six sites in Utah. We determined SNV antibody prevalence and estimated the number of recent infections with an avidity enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Antibody prevalence in adults (n = 735) was 22%, and putative maternal antibody prevalence in juveniles (n = 177) was 7%. Sampling period explained a significant amount of the variance in the probability of recent infections, which were two times more common in May versus September. Additionally, prevalence of high-avidity maternal antibodies (i.e., from dams with older infections) in juveniles did not correspond to the antibody avidity patterns in adult females. In May, no juveniles had high-avidity antibodies compared to adult females (49%); in September, avidity could not be measured in juveniles because none were seropositive, despite large sample sizes (n = 84) and an 11% seroprevalence in adult females. Based on the results, coupled with those from the literature, we speculate that the majority of new infections may occur predominantly in the spring and that SNV may impair reproductive output of females.
  Key words:  Avidity, deer mice, maternal antibody, Peromyscus maniculatus, Sin Nombre virus.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
E. R. Kallio, M. Begon, H. Henttonen, E. Koskela, T. Mappes, A. Vaheri, and O. Vapalahti
Hantavirus infections in fluctuating host populations: the role of maternal antibodies
Proc R Soc B, June 30, 2010; (2010) rspb.2010.1022v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the Wildlife Disease Association.