JWD
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 45(1), 2009, pp. 29-40
© Wildlife Disease Association  2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cole, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hartup, B. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cole, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hartup, B. K.

POSTMORTEM EVALUATION OF REINTRODUCED MIGRATORY WHOOPING CRANES IN EASTERN NORTH AMERICA

Gretchen A. Cole1, Nancy J. Thomas2, Marilyn Spalding3, Richard Stroud4, Richard P. Urbanek5 and Barry K. Hartup1,6,7

1 School of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
2 U.S. Geological Survey, National Wildlife Health Center, Madison, Wisconsin 53711, USA
3 Department of Infectious Diseases and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610, USA
4 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Forensics Laboratory, Ashland, Oregon, 97520 USA
5 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Necedah National Wildlife Refuge, Necedah, Wisconsin, 54646 USA
6 International Crane Foundation, Baraboo, Wisconsin 53913, USA

7 Corresponding author (email: hartup{at}savingcranes.org)

ABSTRACT:   Reintroduction of endangered Whooping Cranes (Grus americana) in eastern North America has successfully established a migratory population between Wisconsin and Florida. Eighty birds (47 males, 33 females) were released between 2001 and 2006, and all birds were tracked following release with satellite and/or VHF monitoring devices. By the end of 2006, 17 deaths (12 males, five females) were recorded from this population. Postmortem findings and field data were evaluated for each bird to determine the cause of death. Causes included predation (n=8, 47%), trauma (n=2, 12%), and degenerative disease (n=1, 6%); the cause of death was undetermined for 35% (n=6) of the birds. Based on physical evidence, the primary predator of the birds was the bobcat (Lynx rufus). Limited roosting habitat availability or bird behavior were likely prime factors in the occurrence of predation. Traumatic injuries and mortality were caused by gunshot, electrical utility lines, and an unknown source. The lone case of degenerative disease was due to chronic exertional myopathy associated with translocation. Available postmortem testing did not indicate the presence of infectious disease in this limited sample.
  Key words:  Bobcat, Grus americana, gunshot, Lynx rufus, predation, trauma, utility line, Whooping Crane.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the Wildlife Disease Association.