|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Wildlife, Fish & Conservation Biology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, USA
2 Independent Scientific Group on Cattle TB, c/o Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, 1A Page Street, London SW1P 4PQ, UK
3 Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, St. Marys Campus, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, UK
4 Nuffield College, Oxford OX1 1NF, UK
5 Central Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, York YO41 1LZ, UK
6 Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Woodham Lane, Surrey KT15 3NB, UK
7 Department of Statistics and Modelling Science, University of Strathclyde, Richmond St., Glasgow G1 1XH, UK
8 Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK
9 Veterinary Laboratories Agency Carmarthen, Jobs Well Road, Johnstown, Carmarthen SA31 3EZ, UK
12 Corresponding author (email: rosie.woodroffe{at}ioz.ac.uk)
ABSTRACT:
Bovine tuberculosis (TB) is a zoonotic disease that can have serious consequences for cattle farming and, potentially, for public health. In Britain, failure to control bovine TB has been linked to persistent infection of European badger (Meles meles) populations. However, culling of badgers in the vicinity of recent TB outbreaks in cattle has failed to reduce the overall incidence of cattle TB. Using data from a large-scale study conducted in 1998–2005, we show that badgers collected on such localized culls had elevated prevalence of Mycobacterium bovis, the causative agent of bovine TB, suggesting that infections in cattle and badgers were indeed associated. Moreover, there was a high degree of similarity in the M. bovis strain types isolated from cattle and associated badgers. This similarity between strain types appeared to be unaffected by time lags between the detection of infection in cattle and culling of badgers, or by the presence of purchased cattle that might have acquired infection elsewhere. However, localized culling appeared to prompt an increase in the prevalence of M. bovis infection in badgers, probably by disrupting ranging and territorial behavior and hence increasing intraspecific transmission rates. This elevated prevalence among badgers could offset the benefits, for cattle, of reduced badger densities and may help to explain the failure of localized culling to reduce cattle TB incidence.
Key words: Badger, Meles meles, Mycobacterium bovis, perturbation, proactive culling, randomized badger culling trial, reactive culling, tuberculosis.
10 Current address: Institute of Zoology, Regents Park, London NW1 4RY, UK
11 Current address: Infectious Disease Epidemiology Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. M. Tompkins, D. S. L. Ramsey, M. L. Cross, F. E. Aldwell, G. W. de Lisle, and B. M. Buddle Oral vaccination reduces the incidence of tuberculosis in free-living brushtail possums Proc R Soc B, August 22, 2009; 276(1669): 2987 - 2995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |