HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by DeGroote, L. W. Articles by Rodewald, P. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by DeGroote, L. W. Articles by Rodewald, P. G.

¹ School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, 210 Kottman Hall, 2021 Coffey Rd, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
² Corresponding author (email: degroote.1{at}gmail.com)

ABSTRACT:   Intensity of hematozoan infection is infrequently quantified because accurate calculations require visual counts of parasites relative to a large number of erythrocytes. Manual quantification of erythrocytes can be circumvented by using ImageJ software (developed by the National Institutes of Health) to count erythrocyte nuclei from digital images. Here we use the ratio of microscope erythrocyte counts to digital image erythrocyte counts (field:image ratio) to extrapolate erythrocyte counts from smaller digital images to the microscope’s larger field of view. Field:image ratios were consistently calculated from 10 slides (resampling P = 0.049) and used to rapidly estimate intensity of infection within 50,000 or more erythrocytes. Intensity of hematozoan infection calculated from manual quantification of 2,000 erythrocytes was significantly lower (0.46 times) than intensity calculated from digital quantification of 50,000 erythrocytes (bootstrap P = 0.02). We contend that digital quantification of hematozoan infection offers a rapid and precise method to quantify infections of low to moderate intensity.
  Key words:  Birds, blood parasites, digital microscopy, hematozoa, ImageJ, infection intensity.