HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hall, J. S. Articles by McLean, R. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hall, J. S. Articles by McLean, R. G.

¹ USDA, APHIS, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, Colorado 80521, USA
² Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi 39762, USA
³ USDA, APHIS, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Texas Field Station, Kingsville, Texas 78363, USA
⁴ USDA, APHIS, Wildlife Services, Moseley, Virginia 23120, USA
⁵ Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University–Kingsville, Kingsville, Texas 78363, USA
⁶ Colorado State University, Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA
⁷ USDA, APHIS, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Florida Field Station, Gainesville, Florida 32641, USA
⁹ Corresponding author (jshall{at}usgs.gov)

ABSTRACT:   Swine play an important role in the disease ecology of influenza. Having cellular receptors in common with birds and humans, swine provide opportunities for mixed infections and potential for genetic reassortment between avian, human, and porcine influenza. Feral swine populations are rapidly expanding in both numbers and range and are increasingly coming into contact with waterfowl, humans, and agricultural operations. In this study, over 875 feral swine were sampled from six states across the United States for serologic evidence of exposure to influenza. In Oklahoma, Florida, and Missouri, USA, no seropositive feral swine were detected. Seropositive swine were detected in California, Mississippi, and Texas, USA. Antibody prevalences in these states were 1% in Mississippi, 5% in California, and 14.4% in Texas. All seropositive swine were exposed to H3N2 subtype, the predominant subtype currently circulating in domestic swine. The only exceptions were in San Saba County, Texas, where of the 15 seropositive samples, four were positive for H1N1 and seven for both H1N1 and H3N2. In Texas, there was large geographical and temporal variation in antibody prevalence and no obvious connection to domestic swine operations. No evidence of exposure to avian influenza in feral swine was uncovered. From these results it is apparent that influenza in feral swine poses a risk primarily to swine production operations. However, because feral swine share habitat with waterfowl, prey on and scavenge dead and dying birds, are highly mobile, and are increasingly coming into contact with humans, the potential for these animals to become infected with avian or human influenza in addition to swine influenza is a distinct possibility.
  Key words:  Avian influenza, feral swine, serosurvey, swine influenza.

⁸ Current address: USGS, National Wildlife Health Center, 6006 Schroeder Rd, Madison, Wisconsin, 53711 USA