JWD
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 44(1), 2008, pp. 143-150
© Wildlife Disease Association  2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacLean, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Braun-McNeill, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacLean, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Braun-McNeill, J.

PROPOFOL ANESTHESIA IN LOGGERHEAD (CARETTA CARETTA) SEA TURTLES

Robert A. MacLean1,2,5, Craig A. Harms1,3,6 and Joanne Braun-McNeill4

1 Environmental Medicine Consortium and the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 4700 Hillsborough Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, USA
2 North Carolina Zoo, 4401 Zoo Parkway, Asheboro, North Carolina 27205, USA
3 Center for Marine Sciences and Technology, 303 College Circle, Morehead City, North Carolina 28557, USA
4 National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA Beaufort Laboratory, 101 Pivers Island Road, Beaufort, North Carolina 28516, USA

6 Corresponding author (email: craig_harms{at}ncsu.edu)

ABSTRACT:   Rapid, safe, and effective methods of anesthetic induction and recovery are needed for sea turtles, especially in cases eligible for immediate release. This study demonstrates that intravenous propofol provides a rapid induction of anesthesia in loggerhead (Caretta caretta) sea turtles and results in rapid recovery, allowing safe return to water shortly after the procedure. Forty-nine loggerhead sea turtles were recovered as local fishery by-catch in pound nets and transported to a surgical suite for laparoscopic sex determination. Treatment animals (n = 32) received 5 mg/kg propofol intravenously (i.v.) as a rapid bolus, whereas control animals (n = 17) received no propofol. For analgesia, all animals received a 4 ml infusion of 1% lidocaine, locally, as well as 2 mg/kg ketoprofen intramuscularly (i.m.). Physiologic data included heart and respiratory rate, temperature, and a single blood gas sample collected upon termination of the laparoscopy. Subjective data included jaw tone and ocular reflex: 3 (vigorous) to 0 (none detected). Anesthetic depth was scored from 1, no anesthesia, to 3, surgical anesthesia. Turtles receiving propofol became apneic for a minimum of 5 min with a mean time of 13.7 ± 8.3 min to the first respiration. Limb movement returned at a mean time of 21.1 ± 16.8 min. The treatment animals were judged to be sedated for ~30 min (mean anesthetic depth score ≥ 1.5) when compared to controls. Median respiratory rates for treatment animals were slower compared to controls for the first 15 min, then after 35 min, they became significantly faster than the controls. Median heart rates of control animals became significantly slower than treatment animals between 40 and 45 min. Physiologic differences between groups persisted a minimum of 55 min. Possible explanations for heart rate and respiratory rate differences later in the monitoring period include a compensatory recovery of treatment animals from anesthesia-induced hypoxia and hypercapnia or, alternatively, an induced response of the nonsedated control animals. The animals induced with propofol were easier to secure to the restraint device and moved less during laparoscopy. In conclusion, propofol is a safe and effective injectable anesthetic for use in free-ranging loggerhead sea turtles that provides rapid induction and recovery.
  Key words:  Anesthesia, Caretta caretta, free ranging, propofol, reptile, sea turtle.

5 Current address: Audubon Nature Institute, 6500 Magazine Street, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118, USA




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
R. H. Broomhead, R. J. Marks, and P. Ayton
Confirmation of the ability to ventilate by facemask before administration of neuromuscular blocker: a non-instrumental piece of information?
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2010; 104(3): 313 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the Wildlife Disease Association.