JWD
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 43(1), 2007, pp. 48-60
© Wildlife Disease Association  2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Symonds, E. P.
Right arrow Articles by Mills, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Symonds, E. P.
Right arrow Articles by Mills, P. C.

SURVEILLANCE FOR BATRACHOCHYTRIUM DENDROBATIDIS USING MIXOPHYES (ANURA: MYOBATRACHIDAE) LARVAE

Emma P. Symonds1,4, Harry B. Hines2, Philip S. Bird3, John M. Morton1 and Paul C. Mills1

1 School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4072, Queensland, Australia
2 Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, PO Box 64, Bellbowrie 4070, Queensland, Australia
3 Oral Biology and Pathology, School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4072, Queensland, Australia

4 Corresponding author (email: pearl66{at}bigpond.com.au)

ABSTRACT:   Fourteen populations of anuran larvae (tadpoles), including three populations of the endangered Fleay’s Barred Frog (Mixophyes fleayi) and 11 populations of the common Great Barred Frog (Mixophyes fasciolatus), in creek sites in the southeast region of Queensland were selected. Site selection was based on a history (within the district) of adult frog population declines and/or disappearances or records of infection of adult frogs or larvae by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Larvae were collected once from each creek site between October 2002 and October 2004, and were between Gosner developmental stages 25 and 40. Total body length ranged from 18 mm to 100 mm. Mouthparts were examined under a dissecting microscope for grossly visible abnormalities, and then examined for histologic evidence of B. dendrobatidis. The most consistent mouthpart abnormalities found were multifocal depigmentation of the jaw sheaths and loss or shortening of the tooth rows. At the individual larva level, presence of mouthpart abnormalities was strongly associated with histologic diagnosis of B. dendrobatidis (93%). At least one larva with abnormal mouthparts was detected at 12 of the 14 sites and histologic evidence of B. dendrobatidis was detected at 13 of the 14 sites. These findings suggest that larvae of Mixophyes species are suitable for surveillance for B. dendrobatidis. We conclude that surveillance of B. dendrobatidis where individual larva prevalences of mouthpart abnormalities and histologic evidence of B. dendrobatidis are as high as those observed in this study (66% and 78%, respectively), relatively small numbers of larvae are required to detect these infections. Medium to large larvae (body length >30 mm) were much more likely to be affected than small larvae (body length ≤30 mm), suggesting that larger individuals should be targeted for surveillance.
  Key words:  Anuran larvae, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, chytridiomycosis, Mixophyes fasciolatus, Mixophyes fleayi, mouthparts, surveillance.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Wildlife Disease Association.