JWD Subscribe to eTOC alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 42(2), 2006, pp. 301-306
© Wildlife Disease Association  2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Puschendorf, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bolaños, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Puschendorf, R.
Right arrow Articles by Bolaños, F.

DETECTION OF BATRACHOCHYTRIUM DENDROBATIDIS IN ELEUTHERODACTYLUS FITZINGERI: EFFECTS OF SKIN SAMPLE LOCATION AND HISTOLOGIC STAIN

Robert Puschendorf1,2,3 and Federico Bolaños1

1 Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro de Montes de Oca, Costa Rica
3 Corresponding author (rpuschen{at}biologia.ucr.ac.cr)

ABSTRACT:   Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis is a fungal pathogen that has been implicated in amphibian declines worldwide. Histopathologic techniques have been used to diagnose the disease, but their sensitivity has not been determined. It is also unclear whether the probability of detection varies between skin samples derived from different body parts. We examined 24 Fitzinger’s rainfrogs (Eleutherodactylus fitzingeri) with chytridiomycosis. This is a common frog species with a broad range and high abundance throughout most of Costa Rica. We sampled 12 different body parts from each animal, and alternated the staining between a routinely used stain (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E]), and a more fungus-specific stain (periodic acid–Schiff [PAS]). The pelvic patch and the innermost finger of the hand were consistently the best places to detect the disease, although significant differences were found only with the gular area, the abdomen, and toes four and five. We found more positive samples using PAS than using H&E in all body parts, although significant differences were detected only in samples derived from the pelvic patch. Using the best combination of factors (stain and body part) and animals with the lightest infections (to test the sensitivity of the technique), we calculated that at least 17 sections are needed in order to reach 95% confidence that a frog is or is not infected. We conclude that the choice of stain and body part can significantly alter estimates of prevalence of B. dendrobatidis.
  Key words:  Amphibian declines, Costa Rica, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, detection, histology, sensitivity, staining technique.

2 Current address: School of Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville QLD 4811, Australia







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Wildlife Disease Association.