JWD Your personal alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 41(3), 2005, pp. 542-548
© Wildlife Disease Association  2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Munson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Marker, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Munson, L.
Right arrow Articles by Marker, L.

EXTRINSIC FACTORS SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT PATTERNS OF DISEASE IN FREE-RANGING AND CAPTIVE CHEETAH (ACINONYX JUBATUS) POPULATIONS

Linda Munson1,5, Karen A. Terio1, Michael Worley2, Mark Jago3, Arthur Bagot-Smith4 and Laurie Marker4

1 Department of Veterinary Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA
2 Center for Reproduction of Endangered Species, Zoological Society of San Diego, San Diego, California 92115, USA
3 Otjiwarango Veterinary Clinic, Otjiwarango, Namibia
4 Cheetah Conservation Fund, Otjiwarango, Namibia

5 Corresponding author (email: lmunson{at}ucdavis.edu)

ABSTRACT:   The cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) has been considered a paradigm for disease vulnerability due to loss of genetic diversity. This species monomorphism has been suspected to be the basis for their general poor health and dwindling populations in captivity. North American and South African captive populations have high prevalences of hepatic veno-occlusive disease, glomerulosclerosis, gastritis, and systemic amyloidosis, diseases that are rare in other species. Unusually severe inflammatory reactions to common infectious agents have also been documented in captive cheetahs. The current study compared disease prevalences in free-ranging Namibian cheetahs with those in two captive populations of similar ages. The occurrence of diseases in the free-ranging population was determined from 49 necropsies and 27 gastric biopsies obtained between 1986 and 2003 and compared with prevalences in 147 North American and 80 South African captive cheetahs. Except for two cheetahs, the free-ranging population was in robust health with only mild lesions present, in contrast with significantly higher prevalences in the captive populations. Despite widespread heavy Helicobacter colonization in wild cheetahs, only 3% of the free-ranging population had moderate to severe gastritis, in contrast with 64% of captive cheetahs. No severe inflammatory reactions to viral infections were detected in the free-ranging animals. Because free-ranging Namibian cheetahs are as genetically impoverished as captive cheetahs, these findings caution against attributing loss of fitness solely to genetic factors and attest to the fundamental importance of extrinsic factors in wildlife health.
  Key words:  Acinonyx jubatus, gastritis, glomerulosclerosis, pathology, veno-occlusive disease.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. Caughey and G. S. Baron
Are cheetahs on the run from prion-like amyloidosis?
PNAS, May 20, 2008; 105(20): 7113 - 7114.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vet Rec.Home page
M. F. Stidworthy, J. C. M. Lewis, J. Penderis, and A. C. Palmer
Progressive encephalomyelopathy and cerebellar degeneration in a captive-bred snow leopard (Uncia uncia)
Vet Rec., April 19, 2008; 162(16): 522 - 524.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Wildlife Disease Association.