JWD Subscribe to eTOC alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 41(2), 2005, pp. 395-400
© Wildlife Disease Association  2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walter, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cartwright, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Walter, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cartwright, M. E.

EFFICACY OF IMMOBILIZING FREE-RANGING ELK WITH TELAZOL® AND XYLAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE USING TRANSMITTER-EQUIPPED DARTS

W. David Walter1,5, David M. Leslie, Jr.2, Jennifer H. Herner-Thogmartin3, Kimberly G. Smith3 and Michael E. Cartwright4

1 Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, 404 Life Sciences West, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078, USA
2 United States Geological Survey, Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, 404 Life Sciences West, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078, USA
3 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701, USA
4 Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, PO Box 729, Hwy 56 East, Calico Rock, Arkansas 72519, USA

5 Corresponding author (email: wdwalte{at}okstate.edu)

ABSTRACT:   From January 1999 to April 2002, 14 free-ranging elk were darted with a mixture of Telazol® reconstituted with xylazine hydrochloride (HCl) in a forested habitat in southwestern Oklahoma and north-central Arkansas. Elk were darted from ground blinds, tree stands, or a vehicle at distances of 14–46 m and were recovered 37–274 m from the dart site. Elk were located using radiotelemetry with 3-cc disposable Pneu-dart® transmitter darts. Mean±SD dose of Telazol® and xylazine HCl was 590±192 mg/ml and 276±153 mg/ml, respectively, and mean time to standing after injection of reversal agent was 27 min (range: 1–65 min). The combination of Telazol® and xylazine HCl successfully immobilized free-ranging elk, and transmitter-equipped darts permitted successful location of sedated elk by two people in areas of dense forest cover. The dose required to sedate elk appeared to vary depending on physiology and behavior, but no drug-induced mortality occurred despite the wide variance in the doses administered. We recommend 500 mg Telazol® reconstituted with 300 mg xylazine HCl as an initial dose for a ≥200 kg elk. If needed to achieve full sedation, up to 3 additional ml of the mixture may be administered without adverse effects.
  Key words:  Cervus elaphus nelsoni, elk, immobilization, Telazol®, transmitter-equipped darts, xylazine hydrochloride.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vet Rec.Home page
A. Dematteis, L. Rossi, G. Canavese, A. Menzano, and P. G. Meneguz
Immobilising free-ranging Alpine chamois with xylazine, reversed with atipamezole
Vet Rec., August 9, 2008; 163(6): 184 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Wildlife Disease Association.