JWD Your personal alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 41(2), 2005, pp. 326-333
© Wildlife Disease Association  2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sydenstricker, K. V.
Right arrow Articles by Kollias, G. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sydenstricker, K. V.
Right arrow Articles by Kollias, G. V.

RE-EXPOSURE OF CAPTIVE HOUSE FINCHES THAT RECOVERED FROM MYCOPLASMA GALLISEPTICUM INFECTION

Keila V. Sydenstricker1, André A. Dhondt2,4, David H. Ley3 and George V. Kollias1

1 Wildlife Health Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-6401, USA
2 Laboratory of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850, USA
3 Population Health and Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, USA

4 Corresponding author (email: aad4{at}cornell.edu)

ABSTRACT:   Fourteen house finches were reinoculated (re-exposed) with 0.05 ml (3.24x105 colony forming units/ml) of Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) in the conjunctival sac of each eye. All birds used in this reinoculation study had recovered from previous infection between 27 and 83 days after inoculation. Recovery was based on the absence of clinical signs of conjunctivitis and/ or the inability to detect MG in conjunctival or choanal samples. Birds were maintained in individual cages under controlled environmental conditions at temperature 21–24 C, relative humidity 70%, and a light cycle adjusted to ambient values. They were divided into three groups, (A, B, and C). Five birds each were reinoculated 219 days (7.3 mo, group A) and 314 days (10.47 mo, group B) after the original infection. The final group of four birds was reinoculated at 425 days after experimental infection (14.17 mo, group C). Although the birds were randomly assigned to the three groups, the duration of the disease state (number of days until clinical signs last observed) during initial infection differed: group A mean=37.0±SE 4.549, group B mean=63.6±SE 6.306, group C mean=42.75±SE 2.750; analysis of variance F2,11=8.17, P=0.007. Within 24 hr after reinoculation six of the 14 experimental birds had developed some clinical signs of MG-induced conjunctivitis. At 3 days after reinoculation, 12 of the 14 birds had unilateral or bilateral conjunctivitis. The duration of clinical signs in the reinoculated individuals was significantly shorter than with their previous infection. These results suggest that the birds were able to mount a rapid and strong immune response following re-exposure. However, they were susceptible to reinfection and developed disease, suggesting that reinfection or perhaps even recurrence of infection and disease could occur in the free-ranging population. This may represent an important component in the epidemiology of this disease in house finches.
  Key words:  Carpodacus mexicanus, conjunctivitis, Eastern house finch, Mycoplasma gallisepticum, avian disease.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Wildlife Disease Association.