JWD Your personal alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 41(1), 2005, pp. 231-235
© Wildlife Disease Association  2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frölich, K.
Right arrow Articles by Latz, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frölich, K.
Right arrow Articles by Latz, N.

SHORT COMMUNICATION

Epizootiologic Investigations of Parvovirus Infections in Free-ranging Carnivores from Germany

Kai Frölich1,6, Wolf Jürgen Streich1, Jörns Fickel1, Sandra Jung1, Uwe Truyen2, Jochen Hentschke3, Justus Dedek4, Dieter Prager5 and Nicole Latz1

1 Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research Berlin, Alfred-Kowalke-Str. 17, PO Box 601103, 10252 Berlin, Germany
2 Institut für Tierhygiene und Öffentliches Veterinärwesen, Veterinärmedizinische Fakultät, Universität Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken 1, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
3 Institut für Lebensmittel, Arzneimittel und Tierseuchen, Invalidenstr. 60, 10557 Berlin, Germany
4 Landesveterinär- und Lebensmitteluntersuchungsamt Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Thierfelderstr., 18059 Rostock, Germany
5 Staatliches Veterinäruntersuchungsamt Arnsberg, Zur Taubeneiche 10–12, 59821 Arnsberg, Germany

6 Corresponding author (email: froelich{at}izw-berlin.de).

ABSTRACT:   To assess if wild carnivores in Germany play a role in the epizootiology of canine parvovirus (CPV) infection, seroprevalences against CPV in free-ranging carnivores (n=1,496) from selected urban and rural areas were compared. Antibodies against CPV were found in sera from red foxes (Vulpes vulpes; 136 of 1,442; 9%), raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonides; two of 33; 6%), stone martens (Martes foina; four of 13; 31%), and pine martens (Martes martes; one of two) using the hemagglutination-inhibition test and pig erythrocytes. Evidence of CPV infection was detected in all study areas. Antibody titers varied between 10 and 320. In red foxes, the number of reactors did not differ between most urban and rural areas. However, we found significantly more reactors in the most densely populated urban area (Berlin). None of 430 tissue samples (small intestine, spleen, mesenterial lymph nodes) from any species tested for the presence of CPV nucleic acid using polymerase chain reaction yielded an amplification product. Based on our results, we believe that contact between domestic dogs and free-ranging red foxes probably plays a subordinate role in the epizootiology of CPV in Germany.
  Key words:  Germany, Martes foina, Martes martes, parvovirus, Nyctereutes procyonides, polymerase chain reaction, serologic survey, Vulpes vulpes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Wildl DisHome page
N. Santos, C. Almendra, and L. Tavares
Serologic Survey for Canine Distemper Virus and Canine Parvovirus in Free-ranging Wild Carnivores from Portugal
J. Wildl. Dis., January 1, 2009; 45(1): 221 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Wildlife Disease Association.