JWD Your personal alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 40(1), 2004, pp. 53-59
© Wildlife Disease Association  2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stanton, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Frasca, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stanton, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Frasca, S., Jr.

RETROSPECTIVE DIFFERENTIATION OF CANINE DISTEMPER VIRUS AND PHOCINE DISTEMPER VIRUS IN PHOCIDS

James B. Stanton1,6,7, Corrie C. Brown1, Steven Poet2, Thomas P. Lipscomb3, Jeremiah Saliki4 and Salvatore Frasca, Jr.5

1 Department of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
2 Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
3 Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC 20306-6000, USA
4 Oklahoma Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory and Department of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078, USA
5 Department of Pathobiology and Veterinary Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-3089, USA

7 Corresponding author (email: jstanton{at}vetmed.wsu.edu)

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues from one Caspian seal (Phoca caspica), one harp seal (Phoca groenlandica), one hooded seal (Cystophora cristata), and one harbor seal (Phoca vitulina vitulina) were used to compare the utility of immunohistochemistry (IHC) versus that of a novel seminested reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to detect and differentiate canine distemper virus (CDV) and phocine distemper virus (PDV). Four antibodies made against PDV were able to detect both viruses. Two antibodies made against cetacean morbillivirus (CMV) did not label antigens from either CDV or PDV. A third anti-CMV antibody inconsistently stained CDV antigens but did not label PDV antigens. The seminested RT-PCR was able to detect RNA of the phosphoprotein gene in all positive cases. Nucleotide sequence analyses of seminested RT-PCR products were used to differentiate CDV RNA from PDV RNA. From these data, it was determined that IHC using antibodies generated against PDV provided a rapid means of detection for both CDV and PDV antigens; however, differentiation between CDV and PDV was achieved only with the RT-PCR assay.

  Key words:  Canine distemper, CDV, immunohistochemistry, phocine distemper, PDV, RT-PCR, seal.

6 Current address: Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 647040, Pullman, Washington 99164-7040, USA




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Wildl DisHome page
O. Nielsen, G. Smith, H. Weingartl, S. Lair, and L. Measures
USE OF A SLAM TRANSFECTED VERO CELL LINE TO ISOLATE AND CHARACTERIZE MARINE MAMMAL MORBILLIVIRUSES USING AN EXPERIMENTAL FERRET MODEL
J. Wildl. Dis., July 1, 2008; 44(3): 600 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Wildlife Disease Association.