JWD Your personal alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 39(3), 2003, pp. 707-711
© Wildlife Disease Association  2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Larsen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Stoskopf, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Larsen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Stoskopf, M.

Failure to transmit avian vacuolar myelinopathy to mallard ducks

RS Larsen, FB Nutter, T Augspurger, TE Rocke, NJ Thomas, and MK Stoskopf


ABSTRACT

Avian vacuolar myelinopathy (AVM) is a neurologic disease that has been diagnosed in free-ranging birds in the southeastern United States. Bald eagles (Haliaeetus leuocephalus), American coots (Fulica americana), and mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) have been affected. Previous investigations have not determined the etiology of this disease. In November and December 2002, we attempted to induce AVM in game-farmed mallards through four, 7-day exposure trials. Mallards were housed in six groups of eight, with two of these groups serving as controls. One group was housed with AVM-affected coots; one group was tube fed daily with water from the lake where affected coots were captured; one group was tube fed daily with aquatic vegetation (Hydrilla verticillata) from the same lake; and another group was tube fed daily with sediment from the lake. No ducks exhibited clinical neurologic abnormalities consistent with AVM and no evidence of AVM was present at histopathologic examination of brain tissue. Although limitations in sample size, quantity of individual doses, frequency of dose administration, duration of exposure, and timing of these trials restrict the interpretation of the findings, AVM was not readily transmitted by direct contact, water, hydrilla, or sediment in this investigation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Wildl DisHome page
F. E. Wiley, S. B. Wilde, A. H. Birrenkott, S. K. Williams, T. M. Murphy, C. P. Hope, W. W. Bowerman, and J. R. Fischer
INVESTIGATION OF THE LINK BETWEEN AVIAN VACUOLAR MYELINOPATHY AND A NOVEL SPECIES OF CYANOBACTERIA THROUGH LABORATORY FEEDING TRIALS
J. Wildl. Dis., July 1, 2007; 43(3): 337 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Wildl DisHome page
T. E. Rocke, N. J. Thomas, C. U. Meteyer, C. F. Quist, J. R. Fischer, T. Augspurger, and S. E. Ward
ATTEMPTS TO IDENTIFY THE SOURCE OF AVIAN VACUOLAR MYELINOPATHY FOR WATERBIRDS
J. Wildl. Dis., January 1, 2005; 41(1): 163 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Wildlife Disease Association.