JWD Your personal alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 38(4), 2002, pp. 693-698
© Wildlife Disease Association  2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mansfield, K.
Right arrow Articles by Land, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mansfield, K.
Right arrow Articles by Land, E.

Cryptorchidism in Florida panthers: prevalence, features, and influence of genetic restoration

KG Mansfield and ED Land


ABSTRACT

The overall prevalence of cryptorchidism in Florida panthers (Puma concolor coryi) from 1972-2001 was 49% (24/49), with a significant increase over time. The earliest age at which descent of both testicles was known to occur was 2 mo and the latest was 10-13 mo. Delayed testicular descent was documented in 23% (8/35) of juveniles examined. Most retained testicles were in the inguinal canal. There was no apparent difference in reproductive success between cryptorchid and normal panthers, although no bilaterally cryptorchid panthers were known to have sired litters. Cryptorchidism was thought to be a manifestation of inbreeding and was one of several factors that led to the development of a genetic restoration plan whereby eight female puma from Texas were released into the panther population in 1995. None of the progeny resulting from genetic restoration efforts has been cryptorchid. This report provides evidence that cryptorchidism in panthers is genetically rather than environmentally based, and demonstrates the utility of genetic restoration for eliminating certain deleterious traits that result from inbreeding.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. M. Fitzpatrick and H. B. Shaffer
Hybrid vigor between native and introduced salamanders raises new challenges for conservation
PNAS, October 2, 2007; 104(40): 15793 - 15798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
G. Delbes, C. Levacher, and R. Habert
Estrogen effects on fetal and neonatal testicular development.
Reproduction, October 1, 2006; 132(4): 527 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
S. Edmands, H. V. Feaman, J. S. Harrison, and C. C. Timmerman
Genetic Consequences of Many Generations of Hybridization Between Divergent Copepod Populations
J. Hered., March 1, 2005; 96(2): 114 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the Wildlife Disease Association.