JWD Subscribe to eTOC alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 37(3), 2001, pp. 523-531
© Wildlife Disease Association  2001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tryland, M
Right arrow Articles by Godfroid, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tryland, M
Right arrow Articles by Godfroid, J

Brucella sp. antibodies in polar bears from Svalbard and the Barents Sea

M Tryland, AE Derocher, Y Wiig, and J Godfroid


ABSTRACT

A prevalence of 5.4% of anti-Brucella sp. antibodies was found in plasma samples from 297 polar bears (Ursus maritimus) from Svalbard and the Barents Sea. Plasma was tested by the classical brucellosis tests Slow Agglutination of Wright (SAW), EDTA modified SAW and Rose Bengal test, as well as by an indirect Protein A ELISA. Only samples classified as positive in all tests were regarded as containing anti-Brucella sp. antibodies. A significant west to east increase in the proportion of bears with anti-Brucella sp. antibodies was found, with 3.6% (n = 253) at Svalbard (Spitsbergen, Nordaustlandet, Edgeoya, Barentsoya and Hopen), and 15.9% (n = 44) in the central Barents Sea. Anti-Brucella sp. antibodies were previously found in ringed seals (Phoca hispida) and harp seals (Phoca groenlandica) from the same geographical areas. The ringed seal is an important prey species for the Svalbard polar bear population, and may thus be a source of brucellosis for the bears. There are no indications of reproductive disorders caused by Brucella sp. or other infectious agents in our study polar bear population. Potential impacts of Brucella sp. exposure on individuals or the population are unknown.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Wildl DisHome page
M. Tryland, E. Neuvonen, A. Huovilainen, H. Tapiovaara, A. Osterhaus, O. Wiig, and A. E. Derocher
SEROLOGIC SURVEY FOR SELECTED VIRUS INFECTIONS IN POLAR BEARS AT SVALBARD
J. Wildl. Dis., April 1, 2005; 41(2): 310 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Wildl DisHome page
M. Tryland, I. Olsen, T. Vikoren, K. Handeland, J. M. Arnemo, J. Tharaldsen, B. Djonne, T. D. Josefsen, and L. J. Reitan
SEROLOGIC SURVEY FOR ANTIBODIES AGAINST MYCOBACTERIUM AVIUM SUBSP. PARATUBERCULOSIS IN FREE-RANGING CERVIDS FROM NORWAY
J. Wildl. Dis., January 1, 2004; 40(1): 32 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the Wildlife Disease Association.