JWD Subscribe to eTOC alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 28(3), 1992, pp. 347-354
© Wildlife Disease Association  1992
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Snipes, K.
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Snipes, K.
Right arrow Articles by Carpenter, T.

Using ribosomal RNA gene restriction patterns in distinguishing isolates of Pasteurella haemolytica from bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis)

KP Snipes, RW Kasten, MA Wild, MW Miller, DA Jessup, RL Silflow, WJ Foreyt, and TE Carpenter


ABSTRACT

Pasteurella haemolytica isolates (n = 31) from two isolated captive herds of Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis canadensis) were characterized and compared phenotypically (biotype, serotype, hemolytic activity) and by a genomic fingerprinting method known as ribotyping. Seven to nine distinct phenotypes were observed. Depending on the method used for serotyping, one to three phenotypes were common to both herds. Eighteen isolates, recovered from both herds, were non-hemolytic, biotype T, indirect hemagglutination assay serotype 4. Ribotyping, a method for highlighting genetically conserved deoxyribonucleic acid restriction site heterogeneity with a 32P-labelled Escherichia coli ribosomal ribonucleic acid probe, produced six to eight distinct ribotype pattern groups within the 31 P. haemolytica isolates, depending on the restriction enzyme used. In contrast to phenotypes, ribotypes appeared unique to each herd, and ribotyping helped to further differentiate some isolates of the same biotype and serotype. In addition, ribotyping provided an alternative means for evaluating relationships between isolates differing in hemolytic activity but which were otherwise phenotypically identical. We propose that ribotyping may be a useful adjunct to other bacterial characterization methods in studying the epizootiology of pasteurellosis in bighorn sheep.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
A. Kodjo, L. Villard, C. Bizet, J.-L. Martel, R. Sanchis, E. Borges, D. Gauthier, F. Maurin, and Y. Richard
Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Is More Efficient than Ribotyping and Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Analysis in Discrimination of Pasteurella haemolytica Strains
J. Clin. Microbiol., February 1, 1999; 37(2): 380 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the Wildlife Disease Association.