JWD Subscribe to eTOC alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 23(4), 1987, pp. 634-640
© Wildlife Disease Association  1987
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kock, M.
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kock, M.
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, R.

Capture methods in five subspecies of free-ranging bighorn sheep: an evaluation of drop-net, drive-net, chemical immobilization and the net-gun

MD Kock, DA Jessup, RK Clark, CE Franti, and RA Weaver


ABSTRACT

Six hundred thirty-four bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) were captured in the western United States between 1980 and 1986, using four different methods: drop-net (n = 158), drive-net (n = 249), chemical immobilization (n = 90) and net-gun (n = 137). The net-gun was found to have considerable advantages over the use of ground nets and chemical immobilization methods for capturing bighorn sheep. Evaluation of specific outcome categories for individual sheep, including normal, compromised (stress-induced), mortality from capture myopathy (CM), and accidental mortality, revealed significant differences in these rates between capture groups (P less than 0.05). The use of the net-gun resulted in the lowest proportion of compromised sheep at 11% (15/137), had no CM mortality, and resulted in a 2% (2/137) accidental mortality. The use of drop-nets resulted in 15% compromised sheep (24/158), a CM mortality rate of 2% (3/158), and an accidental mortality rate of 1% (2/158). A similar proportion of sheep were compromised with the drive-nets (16%, 39/249). This method also had the highest CM mortality rate at 3% (7/249), and an accidental mortality rate of less than 1% (2/249). Chemical immobilization resulted in the most compromised sheep at 19% (17/90), had a CM mortality rate of 2% (2/90), and caused the most accidental deaths at 6% (5/90). Drop-nets and drive-nets were comparable when combining total mortality with rates for compromised bighorn sheep, 18% and 19%, respectively (29/158 and 48/249). Chemical immobilization had the highest combined measure of risk at 27% (24/90) and net-gun lowest at 12% (17/137).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vet Rec.Home page
A. Dematteis, L. Rossi, G. Canavese, A. Menzano, and P. G. Meneguz
Immobilising free-ranging Alpine chamois with xylazine, reversed with atipamezole
Vet Rec., August 9, 2008; 163(6): 184 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Wildl DisHome page
M. R. L. Cattet, N. A. Caulkett, C. Wilson, T. Vandenbrink, and R. K. Brook
Intranasal Administration of Xylazine to Reduce Stress in Elk Captured by Net Gun
J. Wildl. Dis., July 1, 2004; 40(3): 562 - 565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the Wildlife Disease Association.