JWD Subscribe to eTOC alerts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 16(3), 1980, pp. 431-438
© Wildlife Disease Association  1980
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hedger, R.
Right arrow Articles by Gradwell, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hedger, R.
Right arrow Articles by Gradwell, D.

The response of some African wildlife species to foot-and-mouth disease vaccination

RS Hedger, JB Condy, and DV Gradwell


ABSTRACT

The preservation of wildlife is of increasing importance in may countries in Africa but, due to hazards of possible transmission of disease from wild to domesticated species, the interests of the conservationist can conflict with those of the livestock owner. Foremost among transmissible diseases common to many species of both wild and domesticated animals is foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). The effects of FMD vaccination on three important wildlife species, African buffalo (Syncerus caffer), eland (Taurotragus oryx) and impala (Aepyceros melampus), are described. The pattern of response in all three species was similar to that of cattle but of a lower order. The implications are discussed and a vaccination protocol is suggested.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1980 by the Wildlife Disease Association.